Read the following passage carefully and
answer the question that follows:
Under the labour theory of value. the value or
price of a commodity depends exclusively on
the amount of labour going into the production
of the commodity. This implies that either
labour is the only factor of production or labour
is used in the same fixed proportion in the
production of all commodities and that labour
is homogeneous, i.e. of only one type. Since
neither of these assumptions is true, we cannot
base the explanation of the comparative advantage
on the labour theory of values specifically.
Labour is not the only factor of production, nor
is it used in the same fixed proportion in the
production of all commodities. For example,
much more capital equipment per worker is
required to produce some products, such as
steel, than to produce other products such
as textile. In addition. there is usually some
possibility of substitution between labour,
capital and other factors in the production of
most commodities. Furthermore, labour is
obviously homogeneous but varies greatly
in training, productivity and wages. At the
very least. we should allow for different
productivities of labour. Indeed, this is how
the Ricardian theory of comparative advantage
has been tested empirically. In any event, the
theory of comparative advantage need not be
based on the labour theory of value but can be
explained on the basis of the opportunity cost
theory which is acceptable. To be noted is that
Ricardo himself did not believe in the labour
theory of value and used it only as a simple way
to explain the law of comparative advantage.
The law of comparative advantage is sometimes
referred to as the law of comparative cost.