Explanation : Straw man fallacy is giving the impression
of refuting an opponent's argument, while
actually refuting an argument that was
not presented by that opponent; in effect
making the opponent's argument/position/
stand seem more extreme or unreasonable
than is justified by what was actually
asserted.
Argumentum ad baculum is appealing to
force or the threat of force to bring about
the acceptance of a conclusion.
Red Herring fallacy is introducing
irrelevant topic in an argument to divert the
attention of listeners or readers from the
original issue.
Argumentum ad hominem is avoiding
the genuine discussion of the topic at hand
by attacking the character, motive, or other
attribute of the opponent.