Explanation : An asset denominated or valued in terms of
foreign-currency cash flows will lose value if
that foreign currency declines in value. It can
be said that such an asset is exposed to
exchange rate risk. However, this possible
the decline in asset value may be offset by the
the decline in value of any liability that is also
denominated or valued in terms of that foreign
currency. Thus, a firm would normally be
interested in its net exposed position (exposed assets—exposed liabilities) for each period
in each currency.
Although expected changes in exchange rates
can often be included in the cost-benefit
analysis relating to such transactions, in most
cases, there is an unexpected component in
exchange rate changes and often the cost-benefit
analysis for such transactions does
not fully capture even the expected change
in the exchange rate. For example, price
increases for the foreign operations of many
MNCs often have to be less than those
necessary to fully offset the exchange rate
changes, owing to the competitive pressures
generated by local businesses.
Three measures of foreign exchange exposure
are translation exposure, transaction exposure,
and economic exposure. Translation exposure
arises because the foreign operations of MNCs
have accounting statements denominated in
the local currency of the country in which
the operation is located. For U.S. MNCs, the
reporting currency for its consolidated
financial statements are the dollar, so the assets,
liabilities, revenues, and expenses of the
foreign operations must be translated into
dollars. International transactions often
require a payment to be made or received in
foreign currency in the future, so these
transactions are exposed to exchange rate
risk. Economic exposure exists over the long
term because the value of future cash flows
in the reporting currency (that is, the dollar)
from foreign operations is exposed to
exchange rate risk. Indeed, the whole stream
of future cash flows is exposed.